Skip to main content
Measure Type
Policy Outcome
Transport Mode
Geographic Scope
Activity Type
Home
  • About ITF
  • Secretary-General
  • Member Countries
  • Contact
  • Sitemap
  • News
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
Bike sharing
Overview: 

Bike sharing systems cover a certain geographic area with bike stations/docks - locations where bikes are available for the public to rent. The most common bike sharing systems allow individuals to either rent a bike for a single trip, or to purchase a monthly/annual subscription pass. With a monthly/annual pass, subscribers can typically take out a bike as often as they wish, as long as they return it within a certain period of time (often within 30 minutes). Additional minutes/hours are often charged extra. Bikes can typically be returned at any station, irrespective of where the bike was rented. Especially in China, "dockless" bike sharing systems have been implemented: bikes can be parked at any location and are located and unlocked by users via mobile phone applications. 

Bike sharing systems may be provided by public authorities or private companies. Hybrid solutions also exist - for example, a popular solution is to contract a private entity to provide a bike sharing program to a jurisdiction in exchange for the right to use public space to display advertisements, e.g. on billboards, bus shelters, and kiosks, and on the bikes.

As of December 2016, roughly 1 000 cities worldwide had a bike sharing scheme in operation, with a significant share in Europe.

Electric bike sharing schemes have also been introduced, these bikes allow people to travel farther at a lower physical cost. The demand patterns related to these vehicles can therefore be different.

Impact on CO2 emissions: 

CO2 reductions from bike sharing systems come from the replacement of trips formerly made by motorised vehicles. The values differ in the literature, especially on how they are measured.

In general, every car km replaced by bike is equivalent to a reduction of 0.185 kg of CO2. Bike sharing replaces car trips with a different rate in different cities. Bike share users report to have decreased their car use in a range from 0% to almost 50%.

The average reported CO2 reduction has been reported as very small or close to 1%. Some papers report that more than 80% of trips are already non-motorised or public transport users.

Costs: 

There are costs related with the installation, operation, and maintenance of a bike sharing system.

Capital cost estimates range between USD 3 000 and USD 4 500 per bike, and annual operating/maintenance costs between USD 1 200 and USD 2 000. Also, costs for the use of public space, maintenance of the bikes/stations and personnel costs for the operation of the service need to be considered. In return, revenues can be generated by charging bike users for the service and by selling advertising space on the bikes/at the stations, on web or phone applications. In case private organisations are involved in the provision of bike sharing schemes, costs for public authorities can be limited (or entirely avoided).  

Co-benefits: 

Bike sharing schemes can

• Reduce congestion and thereby improve air quality.

• Increase accessibility in the city (users have greater access to places that are beyond their reach on foot).

• Increase the reach and mode share of transit (a critical gap between a transit stop and the final destination can be filled).

• Improve the image of cycling and thereby increase overall mode share of cycling.

• Improve the health of the residents.

• Improve a city’s image and branding.

Other considerations: 

Free-floating bike sharing systems must be appropriately regulated to avoid the volume of bicycles, abandoned or illegally parked, becoming a nuisance.

Dockless systems can interfere with pedestrian space if return of bikes to authorised spots or dedicated spots is not appropriately managed.

If bike infrastructure is not adequate to the travel pattern of bike users, the risk of (fatal) accidents increases considerably, especially for users unfamiliar with local conditions, i.e. tourists.

Related research: 
Public Bikesharing and Modal Shift Behavior: A Comparative Study of Early Bikesharing Systems in North America
Public Bikesharing and Modal Shift Behavior: A Comparative Study of Early Bikesharing Systems in North America
Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia
Bike share’s impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia
E-bike use in Sweden – CO2 effects due to modal change and municipal promotion strategies
The in-use annual energy and carbon saving by switching from a car to an electric bicycle in an urban UK general medical practic
Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future
BICYCLE-SHARING SCHEMES: ENHANCING SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY IN URBAN AREAS
Assessing the Modal Impacts of Public Bike Share Systems: A Comparison of Survey Tools
"Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-
Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis
"Evaluating the impacts of new walking and cycling infrastructure on carbon dioxide emissions from motorized travel: A controlle
"Bike sharing: A review of evidence on impacts and processes of implementation and operation"
Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities
"Dockless bike share code of practice For Operators in London "
Considering user behavior in free-floating bike sharing system design: A data-informed spatial agent-based model
PDF: 
PDF icon Download bike-sharing.pdf (620.18 KB)
Regions covered in related research: 
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
Scope: 

Urban

Measure type: 

Innovation / R&D

Outcome: 

Mode shift and demand management

Mode: 

Rail

Transport: 

Passenger

Share your knowledge on this measure