Multimodal freight interfaces are the nodes in the logistic chain where shipped goods are transferred between different modes of transport. Improving these interfaces will enable maximising the efficiency of operations (e.g. accelerating the transfer of containers or swap bodies between modes reduces the transit time penalty associated with intermodal transport). Improving the interfaces could also help increase capacity, lower costs, increase reliability, employ the right mode for the right tasks and decrease the carbon footprint of freight transportation. Facilitating multimodality would remove bottlenecks on the use of less carbon intensive modes - rail, barges or sea - when they are most suited from an environmental, operational-capacity and economic perspective.
Multimodal interfaces have three basic components: physical, information and institutional. The physical facilities where cargo transfers take place are a critical element, without which there is no multimodality. Having terminals equipped, and with access to different modal networks, is a required condition of multimodality. Common examples of such terminals exist near ports where incoming/outgoing cargo by ship needs to be transferred from sea to land. Dry ports and inland terminals associated with ports are one of the areas where multimodality, including by rail, is more developed. Another critical interface is all the information exchange - business, regulatory and operational – required to manage the flow of goods, which does not necessarily need to be located at the physical terminals. Advances in ICT and Internet of Things (IoT), single logistic windows and integrated data platforms can all contribute to more seamless interfaces. Finally, institutional alignment is also required, between different agents and operators in the supply chain, but also at a higher inter-governmental level. This latter factor, namely the fragmented market and institutions jurisdictions, has been one of the main barriers to better multimodal interfaces.
Synchromodality – co-ordinating the scheduling of different modal services to minimise delays – is a very relevant concept in order to foster multimodal solutions and it requires the existence of strategically located multi-modal terminals.
Intermodal rail is of primary importance to support long-distance trade corridors and inland ports in North America. It accounts for close to 40% of all the ton-miles transported in the United States, while in Europe this share is around 9%.
Following a rail oriented strategy to develop their hinterland the Port of Barcelona increased by a factor of 6 the TEUs (Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit) moved by rail from/to the port, the improvement of port side terminals and inland dry ports in Iberia were decisive for these results.
Improvements of operations at terminals can also decrease emissions from handling cargo at the interfaces. These reductions can go up to 50% of CO2 emissions.
From Basel, Switzerland to the Port of Rotterdam, Netherlands CO2 emissions from rail are eight times less than by road (though this gap can change depending on several factors, e.g. train propulsion, electricity mix, train size and average load). Improved intermodal transfer is one of several factors promoting a modal shift to lower carbon modes. For more numbers on CO2 emissions decrease from multimodal and rail solutions check the Enhanced & expanded Rail for freight measure.
- Small dry port USD 5 million (can be upgraded by stages)
- Very large dry port can go up to USD 175-200 million, e.g. CSX North Baltimore Ohio or BNSF Memphis in US (both able to handle more than 500 000 containers per year).
- Improvements to port terminals, branches and access 44 million (in a 10 year period for the Port of Barcelona)
- Advanced ICT and IoT system have costs, both of implementation and maintenance. They require advanced skill sets and specialised teams. This has been a barrier for SMEs to adopt this type of solutions.
Increased:
- Capacity
- Return on assets and working capital
- Reliability
- Speed
- Resilience
Decreased:
- Cargo lost to theft or damage
- Total supply chain costs
Large terminals may generate an increase in cargo, leading to the possibility of increased truck hauling that increases both noise and the emission of pollutants such as CO, NOx, SO2, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and hydrocarbons that contribute to local air pollution. The noise and vibrations generated by freight vehicles, and the operation of handling equipment, may also be a nuisance to locals living in the area as well as the visual pollution of large container stacks.
"Enhancing the cost competitiveness and the reliability of rail freight services and inland waterways (when the latter are available). The competitiveness of intermodal services in cost and service level partly depends on the length of the road feeder movement at either end of the rail or barge trunkhaul. The length of the road component on the intermodal trip needs to be as short as possible to increase the competitiveness of the intermodal solutions and assure their lower carbon intensity. To achieve this one of the requirements is having a high density of intermodal transfer points serving relatively small catchment areas.
Have a pricing level playing field between modes when it comes to infrastructure cost recovery (higher for rail than for road currently) and internalisation of some external costs (e.g. some form of carbon taxes). Combine with Asset sharing & Digital platforms. "