Aviation fuel tax
Carbon and fuel taxes are levied on the use of carbohydrate-based fuels or the emissions resulting from fuel burn. The main difference between these taxes is whether they are applied per tonne of CO2 emitted or per litre of fuel used. In practice, however, carbon taxes are often administered in the same way as excise fuel taxes: they are based on common commercial units (e.g. litres for liquid fuels such as jet fuel) rather than carbon content or CO2 emissions. One form of tax does not exclude the use of the other, as many countries combine fuel taxes with some form of carbon pricing (a carbon tax or an emissions trading system).
Jet fuel has historically been exempted from tax on international flights in most markets; taxes on jet fuel for domestic flights have, however, been put in place in some countries. As of 2019, these included Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Canada, India, Ireland, Japan, Myanmar, Norway, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Thailand, the United States and Viet Nam . Tax rates vary by country and also – namely for the United States – by state. In 2019, excise taxes ranged from EUR 0.01 (euro) to EUR 0.77 per litre of fuel. Average tax rates applying to domestic jet fuel are much lower than those for road transport fuels. In some countries, fuel excise and carbon taxes combined can reach EUR 300 per tonne of CO2, showing the scope for increased tax rates on jet fuel.
Implementing a tax on fuel used for international flights would require the bilateral amendment of air service agreements between countries. Three concerns regarding their implementation are the risk of carbon leakage (the displacement of CO2 emissions occurring when production activities move from jurisdictions with more stringent climate policies to those with less stringent policies); reduced competitiveness for firms in jurisdictions implementing fuel taxes; and fuel tankering (see “Other considerations” below). Establishing an international fuel tax across several countries for flights within an established perimeter could help limit these risks.
The proposal by the European Commission for a revision of the energy taxation directive, included in the Fit for 55 policy package, goes in this direction, as it includes a provision to end the mandatory tax exemption concerning international aviation fuel. The proposal is to end jet fuel’s tax exemption for fuel used on private and commercial flights within Europe (60% of fuel sales used for international flights, cargo flights or other would, however, still be subject to the exemption).
Jet fuel taxes can also be implemented through bilateral agreements for international flights between two countries.
The proposed tax levies examined in the literature vary greatly, one study concluding they could range from EUR 20 to EUR 700 per 1 000 litres of fuel for fuel taxes; and USD 1 (US dollar) to USD 500 per tonne of CO2 for carbon taxes. Regardless of the method applied, policy makers need to consider that the implementation or increase of existing carbon or fuel taxes – if passed on to the passenger – make flying more expensive, potentially reducing the growth in demand for air transport.
The CO2 reduction benefits of fuel or carbon taxes can come from:
- an increase in the uptake of low-/zero-carbon fuels (in the case of carbon taxes)
- improvements to aircraft energy efficiency (where such developments can be attributed to fuel/carbon taxes)
- demand reduction, provided the level of tax induces a reduction in travel demand, a shift in demand to other modes of transport or a shift of travel demand to shorter trip origin-destination pairs as the resulting increase of operational costs is passed on to the consumer.
The available literature provides the following quantitative estimates for the impact of an aviation fuel tax on related CO2 emissions:
- A European study found that a tax of EUR 330 per 1 000 litres of kerosene could result in an average reduction in CO2 emissions of 11%, based on the resulting increase in ticket price and reduction in demand. National reductions were estimated to range between 4% and 19%.
- Another study found that a globally applied fuel tax would reduce emissions by 3.3% for a tax of USD 63 per 1 000 litres to 13.1% for a tax of USD 293 per 1 000 litres.
- A further estimate suggests that a globally applied carbon tax of USD 200 per tonne of CO2 could reduce aviation emissions by 8% comparing 2024 to 2004 levels.
The main cost of fuel or carbon taxes is borne by airlines and freight forwarders. As these taxes increase the cost of aircraft fuel, operating costs for airlines and freight forwarders will increase. These companies can decide to partially or fully pass the cost on to their passengers or customers, making air fares and freight forwarding services more expensive.
Fuel excise taxes (and fuel-based carbon taxes) have very low administrative costs, similar to road fuel taxes.
Aviation fuel taxes will result in a revenue stream for the authorities that implement them. The collected revenue can be used to provide support measures to help the industry decarbonise and/or to address other adverse impacts of aviation, such as noise or air pollution.
In case fuel taxes are not coherently introduced at the origin and destination airports of a flight and result in different fuel prices, the possible practice of fuel tankering has to be considered and addressed. In fuel tankering, an aircraft carries more fuel than required for its flight in order to reduce or avoid refuelling at the destination airport. Where different fuel prices apply, such a practice typically gains ground, given that the share of fuel costs in operational costs is typically significant for an airline. Carrying more fuel than necessary increases the fuel consumption and thus the amount of CO2 emitted.
There are no legal obstacles to pricing carbon emissions from jet fuel used on domestic flights. Most bilateral air services agreements between countries contain a specific non‑taxation provision, meaning the implementation of international fuel taxes on aviation would require amendments to such agreements. Currently, carbon pricing for international aviation at the global scale can occur only through the relatively weak signals provided by the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Changing this will require further progress in international negotiations.
Possible adverse effects of a fuel or carbon tax on aviation would be related to transport demand and its costs. The following considerations should be taken into account:
- Possible resulting increases in air fares would affect leisure travellers more than business travellers as this market segment tends to have a higher price elasticity of demand. Thinner routes may be disproportionately affected by a loss of connectivity, particularly at smaller/secondary airports.
- Freight forwarding could become more expensive, which could have repercussions on supply chains.
ITF (2021) Transport Climate Action Directory – Aviation fuel tax
https://www.itf-oecd.org/policy/aviation-fuel-tax
ITF (2021), “Decarbonising Air Transport: Acting Now for the Future”, International Transport Forum Policy Papers, No. 94, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/decarbonising-air-transport-future.pdf
Argus (2021), EU draft exempts private jets, cargo from jet fuel tax, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2231434-eu-draft-exempts-private-jets-cargo-from-jet-fuel-tax
CE Delft for the EC (2019) Taxes in the Field of Aviation and their impact. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0b1c6cdd-88d3-11e9-9369-01aa75ed71a1
Eurocontrol (2019) Aviation Intelligence Unit, Think Paper #1 June 2019, https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/2020-01/eurocontrol-think-paper-1-fuel-tankering.pdf
Gonzalez, R. and Hosoda, E.B. (2016) Environmental impact of aircraft emissions and aviation fuel tax in Japan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.08.006
ICAO (1944) Convention on International Civil Aviation, Chicago. https://www.icao.int/publications/Documents/7300_orig.pdf
Keen, M., Parry, I. and Strand, J. (2013) Planes, ships and taxes: charging for international aviation and maritime emissions. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.12019
OECD (2019) Taxing Energy Use – Using taxes for climate action, OECD (2019), OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/058ca239-en.
Sgouridis, S. Bonnefoy, P.A. and Hansman, R.J. (2011) Air transportation in a carbon constrained world: Long-term dynamics of policies and strategies for mitigating the carbon footprint of commercial aviation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.019
Transport and Environment (2021) EU axes airlines’ fuel tax exemption in drive for greener fuels, https://www.transportenvironment.org/press/eu-axes-airlines%E2%80%99-fuel-tax-exemption-drive-greener-fuels
Zhang, J. and Zhang, Y. (2018) Carbon tax, tourism CO2 emissions and economic welfare. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.12.009